- View full judgment as PDF (160.3 KB)
- View full judgment as Word document (47.2 KB)
SUPREME COURT OF THE AUSTRALIAN CAPITAL TERRITORY
Case Title: | Bolaram v ACT Civil and Administrative Tribunal | |
Citation: | [2025] ACTSC 537 | |
Hearing Date: | 4 December 2025 | |
Decision Date: | 4 December 2025 | |
Before: | Muller AJ | |
Decision: | (1) Leave to appeal is refused. (2) The appeal is dismissed. (3) The costs of the appeal be costs in the cause. | |
Catchwords: | INTERLOCUTORY APPEAL – PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – Application for leave to appeal from interlocutory directions of Senior Deputy Registrar – broad discretion to make directions – circumstances weigh against granting leave – leave refused | |
Legislation Cited: | Court Procedures Rules 2006 (ACT), Sch 5 – Pt 5.1, rr 1401, 1147 | |
Cases Cited: | McKay v Paule [2022] ACTCA 72 | |
Parties: | Venumadhava Bolaram ( First Plaintiff) Vinutha Bolaram (Second Plaintiff) Australian Capital Territory ( Ninth Defendant) | |
Representation: | Counsel Self-represented ( Plaintiffs) WDB Buckland ( Ninth Defendant) | |
| Solicitors Self-represented ( Plaintiffs) ACT Government Solicitor ( Ninth Defendant) | |
File Number: | SC 404 of 2025 | |
Decision Under Appeal:
| Court: | ACT Supreme Court |
Before: | Senior Deputy Registrar Noble | |
Date of Decision: | 21 November 2025 | |
Case Title: | Bolaram v ACT Civil and Administrative Tribunal | |
Court File Number: | SC 404 of 2025 | |