ACT Magistrates Court Decisions

Full-text published decisions of the ACT Magistrates Court are available on this website.

Recent Published Decisions of the ACT Magistrates Court

  

Uploaded

24 March 2020

Inquest into the death of Pitman [2019] ACTCD 13

CORONERS ACT – deemed death in custody – quality of care, treatment and supervision

Uploaded

23 March 2020

Inquest into the death of Vickery [2020] ACTCD 5

CORONIAL LAW – cause and manner of death – industrial accident – related indictable offences prosecuted – no matter of public safety – hearing unnecessary

Uploaded

12 March 2020

Linden v KA [2020] ACTMC 2

CRIMINAL LAW - PARTICULAR OFFENCES – EVIDENCE - Offences Against the Person - Indecent Assault -  Consent -  Recklessness - Advertent and Inadvertent Recklessness -  Complaint Evidence.

Uploaded

5 March 2020

Moloney v Zhu [2020] ACTMC 3

CIVIL LAW – assessment of costs - application of Road Transport (Third Party Insurance) Act 2008 – application of Civil Law (Wrongs) Act 2002 – mandatory final offer – non-economic loss

Uploaded

24 February 2020

Inquest into death of Julie Ann Hermans [2020] ACTCD 4

CORONIAL LAW – cause and manner of death – whether submissions raise questions as to cause of death – application of human rights legislation – “common sense” test of causation – whether public hearing necessary – whether matter of public safety arises

Uploaded

2 December 2019

Bektas & Anor v M and D Investments (ACT) Pty Ltd [2019] ACTMC 35

PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – application to set aside default judgment – default judgment set aside by consent – costs – whether ‘general rule’ should apply that party seeking to set aside default judgment should pay the costs of the other party – application for default judgment made without warning – whether default judgment was irregularly obtained – whether mere technical error constitutes default judgment irregularly obtained – incorrect description of claim as a liquidated demand – meaning of liquidated demand – default judgment for specified amount wrongly obtained – application to set aside not seeking indulgence of the Court – default judgment should never have been signed – plaintiffs to pay defendant’s costs of the application

Uploaded

2 December 2019

Jones v Australian Capital Territory [2019] ACTMC 34

CIVIL LAW – application for special assistance under Victims of Crime (Financial Assistance) Act 1983 (ACT) – whether applicant was engaged in the commission of a serious crime or a minor crime at the time the injuries were sustained – whether applicant suffered “an extremely serious injury” – meaning of “extremely serious injury” – legislative test relates to the results of, not seriousness of, injury sustained – evidence does not prove on the balance of probabilities that impairment or disfigurement resulted in a great and permanent reduction in quality of applicant’s life or was otherwise extremely serious

Uploaded

29 November 2019

Ylisalo v Moodie & Ors [2019] ACTMC 36

PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – PRELIMINARY DISCOVERY – application alleging failure to provide documents pursuant to s 68(1)(a)(i) of the Civil Law (Wrongs) Act 2002 (ACT) – whether documents produced were “about the accident” within the meaning of s 68(1)(a)(i) – whether the first defendant breached s 68(1)(a)(i) by late production of documents – application dismissed
PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – application for summary judgment – strike out – whether threshold for summary judgment is met – where plaintiff’s claim against first defendant gives rise to a real question to be determined – application dismissed PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – application for summary judgment – strike out – where second defendant did not exist at the time of the accident – consideration of possible pre-incorporation contract – consideration of plaintiff’s potential future claim being statute barred – plaintiff’s claim against second defendant struck out


Uploaded

6 November 2019

Inquest into death of Theadora Zaal [2019] ACTCD 17

CORONIAL LAW – cause and manner of death – in-hospital cardiac arrest following elective surgical procedure – history of heart condition – whether delay in defibrillation – whether subsequent failures to defibrillate shockable rhythms – whether sufficient appropriately trained staff available to assist in resuscitation – possibility that defibrillator did not detect shockable rhythm – unable to rely on resuscitation record – whether sufficient medical staff available at private hospital to cover emergencies – two matters of public safety – hearing unnecessary – recommendations made

Uploaded 5 November 2019

Inquest into death of Jeffrey Brown [2019] ACTCD 16

CORONIAL LAW – cause and manner of death – whether medical procedure contributed to death – whether appropriate investigations made – whether failure to diagnose complication of treatment – whether post-surgical treatment appropriate – conflicting expert reports – no matter of public safety – hearing unnecessary